• Subscribe to Enter your email address:


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    © Jay Sears, All Rights Reserved.

    Become a Fan

    « College Insights at Rye Free Reading Room Tuesday Evening | Main | BOE Meeting: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 »


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.



    i find it amazing that Councilwoman Bucci says the only expenses the city council can control is retiree health care costs. She must be an idiot because she and the other members of the city council are throwing our tax dollars away with these tax settlements.

    What about the $1,000,000+ in legal fees in 2016 that was $500,000+ over budget?

    Waters Edge is getting a $275,000 refund and a $75,000 annual tax assessment decrease going forward.

    Why is Rye Corporation Counsel Kristen Wilson's former law firm Harris Beach the attorney of record on the settlement?

    Did Harris Beach and/or Wilson receive outside legal fees for this?

    Is there some kind of quid pro quo in place?

    Sack should stop conducting City of Rye business behind closed doors in executive session.


    And - word of yet another six-figure settlement against the city assessor has just reached us. Seems like this was an unsustainable planned strategy of selective ambush assessments now unraveling. Developing.


    Dear tedc,

    Great analysis. This Rye City Council is useless and clueless.

    BTW I go to bed at night resting easy knowing that Councilwoman Epstein is taking such a strong stance on swastikas being painted on walls in Chicago or wherever. Im guessing it's probably to deflect from Rye's ongoing corruption and her ignoring it.


    A bigger question I believe is – how in the world did this assessment get applied to the Apawamis Club to begin with? Secondly, why did the city not force the club into the court system where the 2nd Department Court of Appeals has ruled repeatedly against both resident homeowners and other municipalities (Town of Rye) in favor of Rye City for years? And 3rd, why has this news broken without warning and no mention of this possible loss been posted to the city’s weekly litigation updates?

    The answer I’m afraid is – the city could not risk yet another simultaneous documentary discovery of yet another selective reassessment by Rye City Assessor Noreen Whitty and Rye Corporation Counsel Kristen Wilson.

    My own property tax case which the city forced upon me is I believe instructive – and its dates overlapping. In it the evidence accumulated at trial by the Supreme Court found Rye had no reasonable methodology for the assessment amounts it made up – just as they did to Apawamis starting in 2010. Here’s a flavor of that inequity from my own NYS Supreme Court ruling in November 2012 -

    “Thus, while Whitty may have explained her reasoning for the assessment changes, namely that there were improvements, she wholly failed to justify those changes, as required. Her changes do not appear, from her testimony, to have been based on objective data; they do not appear to have been calculated based on an accepted approach or methodology; she appears to have consulted no manuals, tables, or any other authorities on costing; and, most importantly, whatever basis she used for her conclusions, it did not appear in an "...equitable, comprehensive, written plan directed to the revaluation of all of the properties in the Town." Leone, supra. Consequently, having failed in its burden to explain and justify the 2003 and 2004 reassessments in the instant matter, namely the increase in the assessed value in 2003 to $103,700, over the 2002 value, and the increase in assessed value in 2004 to $120,020 over the 2003 value, respondent's actions are found to have constituted selective reassessment of the subject premises."

    Ex-Rye Deputy Mayor and attorney Laura Brett publicly insisted my case HAD to be brought to the 2nd Department and therein tried to the upmost. Councilwoman Brett and the rest of the city council of that era (including now Mayor Joe Sack) were obviously aware that my 2012 Supreme Court ruling would impact the standing of the new 2010 Apawamis assessment and many others. They had to buy time and hope the 2nd Department would toss out my judgment. It did in late 2014. Yet this Apawamis matter – unlike my simultaneous case - was ticking along the whole time and was kept out of public view.

    And now the big bang from Apawamis is here, clobbering taxpayers unexpectedly. And the golfers never even had to go to court and testify. How very special, and very selective.

    The comments to this entry are closed.