SUBSCRIBE NOW

  • Subscribe to MyRye.com: Enter your email address:

TRANSLATE

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    © Jay Sears, All Rights Reserved.

    Become a Fan

    « Otis to Sack: False Comments Made at July 12th City Council Meeting | Main | Shotgun Wedding (Officiant) for Rye »

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Need Change

    Ted,
    You are correct about sterling. In the late 90's Sterling field was created with money given to the city by the Osborn home. The reason for this was because they eliminated the playing field behind Osborn school to build the residential living on the Osborn grounds. When they built Sterling field I don't believe it was ever built correctly. I remember truck loads of fill Coming in and thats why the field is so high up and It's not a level field at all. Always has been a mud field. Not only that any talk of making that field turf is ridiculous because with having a landfill under that I can't see that being safe. Should there be vents to release gasses? I don't think the field now is safe for kids to play on. Who's to say after 20 years nothing has risen to the surface. Moving the DPW is irresponsible. Sure sounds good but the clean up of the entire site would cost millions. Who the hell knows what has been leaking into the ground there or dumped. I agree with making changes to Disbrow park. Make the road safer or relocating it so that maybe there is no road between Founder and Grainger field but the DPW should stay where it is with perhaps some modifications. The thruway site should be sold to RCDS so that nothing else is put there and on weekends I'm sure rye organizations can use that field. I ask anyone on here from the council why not spend all this money you seem to have to fix existing field space no longer used in Rye. Like Midland school where when I was kid Rye Little League games were played. It's a shame that Rye has become so overcrowded and all open space is gone -trees have been cut down due to the greed of the council and builders and everything subdivided. I definitely believe corruption is rampant no matter what party is in control. Greed created the new Rye and its why so many are angry and the average joe can't do a thing. Maybe a FBI investigation needs to be done at city hall.

    tedc

    Mr. Glickenhaus’s premise here, as in his recent late night speech at City Hall, is very well founded. In the mid 1960’s, when Mr. Sack’s adjacent residential cul-de-sac was primal woods, the Rye DPW ran an open air general dump located under the raised rear playing field at Disbrow (Sterling?). We spent many pleasant days getting chased out of that dump by city employees who caught us scavenged for mini-bike engines and assorted parts among the discarded lawn mowers stacked next to broken bags of pesticides layered among television sets and on top of mounds of home shelving and acres of discarded clothing. The pervasive chemical smell near the piles was sharp and nauseating but Joe at the guard shack had a kindness for us and told us to be quick, and he secretly saved the best upright mower engines in the tall weeds near the guard shack for us from the scrap dealers who paid the city for the right to harvest the discarded household detritus of Rye. What my friends and I saw and smelled leaking into that ground in that era would likely get it qualified for superfund site designation today. Mr. Glickenhaus is right. Best not to disturb even a teaspoon full of it.

    Jim Glickenhaus

    I am stunned by the fiscal irresponsibility of Mayor Sack and the majority of the city council including Terry who without doing an environmental feasibility study of what the cost to MOVE DPW to a site we don't even own and remediate 100 years of dumping at Disbrow which could easily be tens and Tens of million dollars would still push blindly ahead with this 50++ Million dollar absurd plan.

    www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1349747456

    I keep saying it, but I do not understand why once the HUGE cost of this was revealed, ($39 million, before we buy a site) that wasn't the end. It is patently ridiculous to imagine we would purchase this site adding another $7.5Million before the ground was leveled to move DPW, to add one more playing field to Disbrow. It just makes no sense. Steve's bill is written to allow us to veto any plan of RCDS's we don't like. It is a win/win. Let's take this gift and run with it instead of continuing to attack good people who are just trying to do what is best for Rye. The whole this has turned into a huge unnecessary mess. I really don't understand why this is still going on.

    Rye City Democrats

    Another thing that is not in Rye residents' interests is the Mayor's attempt to limit public commentary on Disbrow.
    *He refused Councilwoman Danielle Tagger-Epstein's request (made on behalf of a resident who could not attend for health reasons) to have the June 26 Disbrow meeting videoed, telling her by email, "We've heard by email from lots of folks recently who have registered their particular views. I suspect many of those folks may show up at the next workshop. I'm not so certain that it is productive to have the workshop serve as a vehicle for those folks to record a video version of their emails."
    *At the July 12 City Council meeting he moved the opportunity to comment - Item 8 on the agenda - from the middle of the meeting to after 11 pm. A number of people who had come to comment saw that he passed over Item 8 and left, not realizing residents could still comment at the end of the meeting.

    Rye City Democrats

    If you are persuaded by the Mayor's statement, please read this before you make up your mind: http://nyassembly.gov/member_files/091/pdfs/2017_76419.pdf

    Rye City Democrats

    Rye residents: do you want a playing field costing
    $50+ million? Over ten times as much as any previous City borrowing? More than the City's entire annual income? Nope, we don't either. Nor do we want a Mayor deflecting attention from his mistake with misdirection, attack and distraction.

    The comments to this entry are closed.